Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Thursday December 4, 2008

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

A Global Economy and Development and Wolfensohn Center for Development Event

Can the World Be Governed? Possibilities for Effective Multilateralism

Global Economics, Global Governance, Global Finance, World Trade Organization, G8


Event Summary

As the global economic and power structures have shifted in recent years, calls for reform of global institutions and governance mechanisms have increased. From the recent collapse of the World Trade Organization’s Doha round of trade talks to calls for enlarging the Group of Eight, the international governance system continues to be challenged. Is reform of current international organizations and processes possible and if so, what are the best options for effective reform?

Event Information

When

Wednesday, September 10, 2008
4:00 PM to 5:30 PM

Where

Saul/Zilkha Rooms
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC
Map

Event Materials


Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

E-mail: events@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

On September 10, Brookings hosted the Centre for International Governance Innovation, a Canada-based think tank, for a discussion of these issues as analyzed in their recent volume “Can the World Be Governed? Possibilities for Effective Multilateralism.” Panelists included: Alan S. Alexandroff, senior fellow, Centre for International Governance Innovation; William Antholis, managing director, Brookings; and Richard Rosecrance, adjunct lecturer, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard. Johannes Linn, executive director and senior fellow, Wolfensohn Center for Development at Brookings, moderated the discussion.

A question and answer session followed the panel discussion. A reception followed the briefing.

Transcript

JOHANNES LINN: Over the last two to three years, we've heard quite a lot in this town debated around particular areas of global governance reform including United Nations reform; closer to home in a sense here, IMF reform has been popping up repeatedly and actually will be discussed and probably decided on by the governors of the IMF at the upcoming annual meetings. World Bank reform is picking up speed in terms of its governance structure. We have had ongoing debates around the question of whether the G8 is in fact still serving its function in today's world and that has recently gathered some speed around the concept of democracies or a league of democracies or whatever which are being promoted by a number of people including some in this building. So there are a number of individual ideas that are popping around based around individual reforms and it's a question -- why is this? Why are we all worried about this? There are a number of factors which the book picks up on which I'm sure we'll hear more about.

First of all, the shifting power balances in the world with of course China, the BRICs more generally, taking on much more of an importance in terms of global economics, political security areas, and this in itself of course brings about questions of whether the global governance system is responsive to these changes. In addition of course, the whole globalization and integration process that we've been watching is an important factor and again will be picked up here.

Very importantly, I think the sense that the international institutions have a number of weaknesses that seem to be resistant to change, so that is a factor that keeps pushing in the direction of reform. Finally demonstrated most recently and painfully in the Georgia crisis. At least what I've been observing in the last two to three years, is a sort of a resurgence of what I would call the East-West divide. I used to work a lot on the former Soviet Union when I was the Vice President of the World Bank, but after 1990-1991, people didn't talk about East-West anymore. It had gone out of fashion. Now in the last few years all of a sudden this divide is creeping back into the way we talk, the way also some of us at least think, and I think it's reflective of new divisions, perhaps old-new divisions, new-old divisions, that are creeping back in. So the question is how do these institutions that we have or that we should have intermediate these divisions and the tensions that we face.

Participants

Moderator

Johannes F. Linn

Executive Director, Wolfensohn Center for Development

Featured Speakers

Alan S. Alexandroff

Senior Fellow, Centre for International Governance Innovation

William J. Antholis

Managing Director, The Brookings Institution

Richard Rosecrance

Adjunct Lecturer in Public Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now