Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Wednesday January 7, 2009

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

How to Get Moderate-Income Households to Save for Retirement

Filling the Savings Gap

Retirement, Macroeconomics, Saving, U.S. Economy


Event Summary

Although the United States spends $150 billion a year on tax preferences for pensions, concerns persist about how well the pension system functions. Only half of all workers participate in an employer-based pension plan in any given year, and participation rates in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) are even lower. As a result, many households are approaching retirement without an adequate nest egg. The median defined contribution balance among all heads of households aged fifty-five to fifty-nine in 2001 was only about $10,000.

Event Information

When

Monday, May 17, 2004
9:30 AM to 11:00 AM

Where

Falk Auditorium
Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20036
Map

Contact: Office of Communications

E-mail: communications@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

At this Brookings event, panelists will explore innovative ways to improve retirement security, including changes to the saver's credit that was part of the 2001 tax legislation and which is set to expire in 2006. The event will also launch the Retirement Security Project, which brings together pension researchers and health care experts to undertake nonpartisan research and outreach aimed at bolstering financial security for America's aging population by raising retirement savings and improving long-term care insurance products.

The Retirement Security Project, supported by a grant from the Pew Charitable Trusts, can be found on the Brookings website at www.brookings.edu/retirementsecurity.

Transcript

J. MARK IWRY: So the strategy with the Saver's Credit was to level the playing field, to some degree, by using a tax credit instead of a deduction. A tax credit mechanism is such that the value of the benefit is independent of the marginal income tax rate, at least if it's a refundable credit, and this credit was designed to be progressive; that is, higher rates of credit for higher incomes—50-percent credit—higher rates for lower incomes, obviously—50-percent credit for people whose income is $30,000 or lower, joint HEI; 20-percent credit for people whose HEI is between $30- and $32,500; and a 10-percent credit above that.

The credit, of course, is not equivalent to a match; that is, it's a government match, but the rate of matching, if you were to compare it to an employer's 401(k) matching contribution, is a little misleading. For a 50-percent credit, you're looking at the equivalent of a 100-percent match of the individual's contributions. You put a dollar in, the government puts 50 cents in your 1040, in effect. It offsets your tax liability by 50 cents, so that your net out of pocket is only 50 cents. Yet the dollar you put in stays in that account. So you end up with a dollar in tax-favored savings, and you only are out of pocket 50 cents. So it's like a 1-to-1 match, even though it's a 50-percent tax credit.

The way the Saver's Credit was enacted though, it was missing four key features. As we designed and proposed it, it was not intended to be temporary, though in the legislation in 2001 that enacted it, it sunsets after 2006. It was a 50-percent credit that was refundable, and therefore available to 60 million households with incomes below $30,000 in joint AGI. Of those 60 million, though, only 10 million actually get anything out of the credit, and virtually none of them get the full $1,000 credit for a $2,000 contribution because it was enacted on a nonrefundable basis.

It was also designed to reach tens of millions of households who were above the income level that it reaches, that is, above $50,000, and the 50-percent credit rate, which covers only people up to $30,000 before it phases down between 30 and 50. That 50-percent credit rate was designed to go all the way up to people earning $50,000 or even higher in the original proposals.

Read the full event transcript (PDF—102KB)

Participants

Introductory Remarks

Maureen Byrnes

Director, Policy Initiatives and the Health and Human Services Program, Pew Charitable Trusts

Moderators

Peter R. Orszag

Joseph A. Pechman Senior Fellow, Economic Studies, Brookings

Panelists

Fred T. Goldberg, Jr.

Partner, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP; Former IRS Commissioner, George H.W. Bush Administration

Len Burman

Senior Fellow, Urban Institute; Co-director, Tax Policy Center

Mark Iwry

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Economic Studies, Brookings; Former Deputy Benefits Tax Counsel, Treasury Department, Clinton Administration

Robert Weinberger

Vice President of Government Relations, H&R Block, Inc.


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now